Ethos

Your record
is yours.

The commitments Ashwam makes to every woman who uses it — and the governance underneath them. Stated in plain language first. Documented in technical and institutional detail second.

The four commitments

What this means
in plain language.

Before any technical detail, here is what we promise — to a woman using Ashwam, in language she should not need a lawyer to interpret.

i.

Your data is yours.

You own your record — every signal, every pattern Ashwam has surfaced about you. You can export it. You can delete it. You can leave with it. No data hostage situations.

ii.

No one sees it without your decision.

Not your partner. Not your employer. Not your family. Not your doctor — unless you choose to share a pre-consult report. Sharing is always an explicit, per-share decision, never a default setting hidden in a menu.

iii.

We ask for what helps you — and nothing more.

Every piece of information Ashwam collects has a defined purpose in building your record or in making the platform work. No tracking pixels. No third-party analytics on your health data. No data collected for purposes you have not been told about.

iv.

Research is a separate decision.

Using the app is one decision. Contributing your data to research is a completely separate one — opt-in, never default, always revocable. You can use Ashwam fully and never share a single record beyond yourself.

Research, separately

Two missions.
One platform.
Two consents.

Ashwam exists to do two things — give a woman a longitudinal record of her own biology, and contribute to building the women's health science that has been missing. Both are real. Neither is a cover for the other. The decision to use Ashwam and the decision to contribute to research are completely separate. Many women will do only the first. Some will choose to do both. The architecture treats both choices as equally valid.

  • i. Research consent is opt-in, never default. The default is no research participation. You actively choose to enable it, programme by programme.
  • ii. Each research programme is its own consent. Agreeing to contribute to one study does not enrol you in any other. The programme, its purpose, its governance, and its outputs are described before you decide.
  • iii. Withdrawal is always available. You can revoke research consent at any time. Already-collected data is removed from the active dataset. What happens to data already used in published analyses is governed by published ethics rules.
  • iv. Researchers cannot download your data. Their approved questions are answered inside our secure environment — the data stays put; the answer goes out.
  • v. Outputs are aggregate. Published results are statistical, model-derived, or aggregate — never your individual record, never re-identifiable.
What we will never do

The trust anchor list.
Plainly stated.

The clearest way to describe a privacy commitment is to name the things that will never happen. The list below is not exhaustive — it is the set of practices we are committing publicly to never adopt, regardless of business pressure, growth pressure, or partner pressure.

Portability & withdrawal

Leave with everything.
Or stay with everything.

A record that you cannot take with you is not your record. Two mechanics make sure yours is.

Export at any time.

Your full structured record — every signal, every pattern Ashwam has surfaced for you — is exportable in a machine-readable format. You can take it to another platform, hand it to your clinician in full, or just keep it. The export is built to be readable, not to be obfuscated. No proprietary lock-in.

Delete and it is gone.

Account deletion removes your data from the active platform within thirty days. Backup retention is bounded and disclosed. If you have contributed to a research programme, the ethics-defined withdrawal mechanism applies — disclosed in the consent for that specific programme, never hidden.

Governance summary

For institutional
and clinical reviewers.

A short reference of the governance posture, for clinicians, ethics committees, partners, and institutional reviewers performing diligence. Detail and current standards documentation are available on request via the partner inquiry form on the North Star page.

Ethics standard
Designed to meet HREC (Australia) and IRB (US) standards for longitudinal cohort study governance. Programme-specific protocols submitted for review with the relevant body of each clinical institutional partner.
Data residency
User data is stored in the region of the user's primary residence — Australia, India, or the United States — under the data-protection regime of that region. Cross-border transfer requires explicit user consent.
Audit & lineage
Every data flow is logged with research-grade audit trail — input source, processing step, output destination, and consent state at the moment of processing. Available to the user on request.
Research access
Researchers do not receive raw user-level data. Approved questions are answered against the dataset within a governed enclave. Outputs are aggregate, derived, or model-based — never re-identifiable.
Withdrawal mechanics
All four consent layers are independently revocable. Withdrawal of research consent triggers the protocol-defined data handling for the specific programme — transparently disclosed in the original consent.
Regulatory posture
Ashwam is currently classified as a wellness application, not a medical device. The product is built with a defined SaMD pathway in view as the evidence base, validation studies, and clinical claims mature.

If anything here
is not yet clear enough, ask.

A privacy commitment that you cannot interrogate is not a commitment. We will answer specific questions in plain language — whether you are a woman thinking about signing up, a clinician considering a pilot, or an institutional reviewer doing diligence on the platform.

Ask a privacy question Back to home